Welcome, to The Human Nature
Channel. I’m you’re host Alex Tamsula and … what … am I doing here? Well
what I’m doing here today is a video in three parts. First … I’ll
start off talking about The Las Vegas Route 91 Harvest Festival Massacre, Truth
Community, and its YouTube video investigators. Then, I’ll tell you
about how I found my way to this community. Finally, I’m going to
cover John Cullen, whose YouTube channel is called John E. Hoover, and aside
from being one of the most prolific YouTubers on the subject, is certainly the
most controversial.
But before we proceed, a
word about the head gear. If I were wearing something like this alal holding my keffiyeh down on my head,
while walking around a Las Vegas Hotel, nobody would bat an eye. Unlike
say, Pittsburgh. You’ll see why this is important later.
Anyway, let’s get started. Mike
Turber, of 5 x 5 News, like some people in this community, is a serious critic
of John Cullen. Serious critic? Hell, what am I saying? Mike
Turber hates the man’s guts. Mike has even gone so far as to do
comedy videos where he lampoons the shit out of John Cullen. For an
evidence-based guy like Mike Turber, I can understand why Cullen raises his ire. I
too, have found Cullen’s logic to be awfully wobbly on somethings. Cullen,
all along, has asserted that since there is no photographic evidence of a
broken window in Room 135 until, 10:30 PM, on the night of October 1, 2017,
ergo, Stephen Paddock didn’t shoot anybody! Well, just because
nobody at the Route 91 Festival, or on The Vegas Strip that night saw a broken
window at first glance, it doesn’t necessarily follow no window was broken.
Even if people were looking
in the direction of Mandalay Bay, at 1200 feet, if they didn’t know where to
look, if they didn’t have binoculars or a telephoto lens on a camera aimed at
the hotel, that is all reflective surfaces, has spotlights on it, is in an
extremely well-lit area creating a haze of light, what does that prove? Not
much from what I can tell. But that doesn’t stop John from jumping
to the conclusion that shots were coming from helicopters full of Saudi Air
National Guardsmen who were in town for some gambling, a show and a massacre.
I once sent John Cullen a
comment on one of his YouTube videos where I told him, I’m an agnostic on the
helicopter story. Shaky cell phone video or police dash cam video of
flashing lights in the sky? That doesn’t really close the deal for me. I
don’t see anything particularly conclusive. And I don’t think John Cullen is as
careful as he ought to be. He has walked back some things; he has
apologized for errors.
But John I think, with his
certainty that The Las Vegas Shooting is connected to the purge of Saudi
Princes, staged by Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, has jumped ahead
way too far into any chain of logic. It leaves him wide open to
criticism. However, in a way, John may on to something. In
the third part of this video, I will add a couple of possible puzzle pieces I
don’t believe John has ever considered, which may make the part of his theory
about MBS more compelling.
Next, I want to say a few
words about Mike Turber at 5 x 5 News. Since I was writing about Mr.
Turber in the first draft of this essay, I thought it might be a good idea to
at least find out what he actually believes about The Las Vegas Shooting. So,
on Friday March 8, I listened to Mike’s interview on The Hidden Truth Show, and
I was impressed with him. An Air Force Vet, cyber security expert,
intelligence analysist, I thought Mike Turber was a pretty sharp guy. As
you all probably know, Mike believes the only shooter was Paddock, Paddock’s
motive being revenge aimed at the casinos because Paddock, not right in the
head, thought the casinos were cheating him. This puts Mike at odds
with most of the rest of the community but hey, this is a big work in progress.
There are even a few things
in my last Las Vegas video, no. 7 The Las Vegas Shooting, The Pittsburgh
Synagogue Shooting, and Laura Loomer, that I might want to rethink after
listening to Mike Turber. Was Room 134 dead bolted from inside and
therefore inaccessible? Mike is sure it wasn’t. Like I
said, work in progress.
Anyway, getting back to Mr.
Turber, I think his critical thinking skills are very good. His use
of logic plays by the rules. His feelings about the fate of Melisa
Ramerez and how her body was treated are righteous. I even liked
this one bit, where he mentioned the hotel receipt to Room 135 that showed room
service for two. Remember when that first surfaced? Oh,
my goodness. People were going on like this is the smoking gun! It
proves Stephen Paddock didn’t act alone!
Well, Mike informs us, that the reason Paddock ordered for two was because that was the easiest way to get a cart up to his room, which would end up sitting outside the door of Room 135. If Paddock had ordered dinner for one, hotel staff would just carry up one meal on a tray. But ordering for two gets Paddock his cart where he can set-up his camera. Mike Turber brilliantly clarifies this issue. As an amateur sleuth, and wannabe spook, I live for stuff like that.
So, Mike Turber has earned
my respect. He uses standard investigatory procedures, evidence
based, things you could take to a lawyer or put before a judge without wasting
their time. When Mike says there is no evidence of a Paddock
accomplice, he’s right!
Now I’ve come to a different
conclusion about Paddock than Mike does, although Mike and I do agree on one
thing: there was sniping before the AR-15 with the bump stock started firing. My
problem is I’m looking at Paddock, who as far as I know, was never in the
military, and I’m not sure he’s a man with enough shooting skill to pick-off
people at 1200 feet. That kind of shooting is not easy to do and he
supposedly did it a number of times.
I have yet to hear anybody
say they observed Stephen Paddock practicing at a gun range. The
closest we get is a story in The Independent, which states,
‘Investigators have uncovered surveillance footage of Stephen Paddock driving
alone into the desert on the Friday before the shooting, law enforcement
officials told the Wall
Street Journal. The remote area – located near his home in Mesquite,
Nevada – is often used by locals for target practice.”
(Mouth hanging open.) That’s
it? That’s pretty paltry if you ask me. I’d like somebody
to come forward saying they saw Paddock practicing with a rifle, anywhere; I’d
like somebody to come forward saying they saw Paddock shooting melons at 1200
feet; I’d like somebody to come forward saying I saw him fire a gun once! If Mike Turber and I ever
have a chance to sit down and talk about these things, I’m sure it will be
lively.
Anyway, before I go any
further, I’d like to mention some people I’ve encountered in The Las Vegas
Shooting Truth Community and how they’ve made me feel welcome. There
is KL, who can be seen as a moderator on Paladin White Hat’s live chats. KL
has subscribed to this channel, watched my video No. 7 on Vegas, Pittsburgh,
and Laura, and gave it a thumbs-up and also commented that she liked it.
I would also like to mention
NINI of NothingIfNotIntense, who’s channel has made numerous deep digs into
Stephen Paddock’s mysterious girlfriend Marilou Danley, showing us a dimension
of Marilou that Big Stinking Corporate Media doesn’t have the guts to get near. I
sent NINI a link to my video no. 7 and she commented back her thanks, and said
she would watch it. To KL and NINI, also known as Jen, I’d like to
say, as someone who has had a mass shooting in his favorite neighborhood, and
who knew one of the victims, your support is greatly appreciated.
I want to mention, 10 ‘o’
Five. Now since I've been tuning into some of NINI's live chats, I know
he's become something of a bad guy. But when I first came across his
channel, I thought he was doing some really terrific Vegas Videos. His
were serious insights from the working man’s perspective. 10 was a
former glazier who, in one of his vids, tells us what we need to know about
installing a hotel window and more importantly, how to take one out. You
want to break out the inner layer of safety glass? Don’t hit it in
the center. Hit it down by the frame or in the corner. That
bit of specialized knowledge blew my mind.
And the window in room 134? All
the glass on the left frame was cleaned from top to bottom, completely. So
that somebody could lean against it? Question mark. Holy
cow. Want to know how to control an unruly bump stock AR-15? Have a chair facing you, so the rifle’s bipod
can hook over the back of the chair, and brace the chair with your body and
your knees. Yes, I said when I heard that, because I covered the
hard to control nature of bump stock in my video No. 7. And 10 talked about the
ammonium nitrate and fuel oil in Paddock’s car in the valet parking space,
which plays a big role in the scenario I will lay-out in the final part of this
video.
However lately, sadly, I’ve
been hearing some strange stuff about 10. That’s distressing. But
keep this in mind. It's possible somebody may have gotten to Ten and
scared the shit out of him. Those aforementioned videos of his? He
took them down and maybe because he said too much and is now wigging out. Let’s
not kid ourselves. If we’re correct and Paddock didn’t act alone, if
there’s a National Security angle here, this could be some dangerous shit. Safety
in numbers.
I also wish to mention
AcesWildMMA LV, the first person in The Las Vegas Truth Community I had an
on-going conversation with, and it was over this interesting factoid: did you
know Stephen Paddock didn’t even die in Las Vegas? No, Paddock died
in Paradise Nevada. Las Vegas proper begins in the downtown section;
The Vegas Strip is actually in the unincorporated town of Paradise. Interesting,
because if, at the heart of The Las Vegas shooting, is an ISIS attack, as some
have claimed, including ISIS, then Paradise would be the place where a Middle
Eastern terrorist would want to go.
Lastly, a hello to the
subject of this video himself, John Cullen. In a Tweet to him I put
a link to my video no. 7 and he gave it a retweet. Even though I’m
putting you the hot seat John, I still want to say thanks.
The Las Vegas Shooting Truth
Community is not about manufactured outrage. These folks are
genuinely angry, are genuinely hurting, and they are the real deal. Watching ordinary citizens,
brave Americans, stand-up and point out that The Las Vegas Metro Police
Department’s Fit Report had autopsies that sometimes followed protocol, and
sometimes didn’t, had forensics with no apparent attempts to determine
ballistics and/or trajectories, where Stephen Paddock’s time of death was
marked down the next day as ‘twelve noon Oct. 2’, where no attempt was made to
determine exactly when Paddock died … watching citizens call bullshit on all
this hurried and therefore sloppy investigating is inspiring.
Understand
this - there’s a problem with Paddock’s height in the autopsy, which I think
has him two inches shorter than what is marked down on his Alaskan fishing
license, same with the autopsy’s different eye color from what the fishing
license photo shows. There’s just too many WTF moments to leave The Las
Vegas Shooting Truth Community satisfied.
Then we get to The FBI’s
three-page Report that concluded Stephen Paddock sought the infamy of his bank
robber father, Benjamin Hoskins Paddock, a career criminal who had once
been on The FBI’s Ten Most Wanted List, but a man who 99.999 percent of the
American public had never even heard of before. What kind of infamy
is that?
The Las Vegas Shooting Truth
Community is not at peace with the explanations from The LVMPD or The FBI,
because it looks as if these Local and Federal law enforcement agencies made-up
their collective minds early that Stephen Paddock was the lone shooter, and
that was that. Now, all evidence must point towards his guilt, and
anything that contradicts that conclusion will be ignored.
Thankfully, The Las Vegas
Shooting Truth Community dares to demonstrate what we should come to expect
from the best of us.
I might add, that there is a
highly likely reason why the explanations from The FBI are so thin, aside from
this being all the FBI investigators could agree on, and it has something to do
with, ‘In The Interests of National Security’. Like we saw during
the investigation into the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, where
the reason for the cockamamie Warren Commission story about the one bullet
doing all these amazing things, from one shooter no less, was ultimately to
protect intelligence assets and ongoing intelligence operations.
In
The Interests of National Security, our Government is never going to fully come
clean about what really happened to JFK, or to the people killed and wounded at
the Las Vegas Route 91 massacre unless we force them into, and through, a House
Congressional Committee Investigation. The Government acts like it has
some kind of mandate to read us all a slew of bedtime stories as if we were a
bunch of little kids. Please pardon the mixed metaphor but
that dog don’t hunt.
We’ll get into this more in
depth when we examine John Cullen’s general explanation of what happened on Oct
1, 2017. Despite some misgivings I have with
his methods, there may be something in John’s overall assessment that is on the
mark, and that involves the ammonium nitrate and fuel oil found in Paddock’s
car in the valet parking space in Mandalay Bay. The presence of bomb making materials is
highly significant, possibly tipping the scales in John’s direction since the
intended bomb clearly shows, that The Las Vegas Route 91 Harvest Festival
Massacre was originally planned to be something much bigger, as in wreck a
building bigger. Let that sink in.
I take a keen interest in America’s history of political assassinations, terrorists attacks, and mass shootings. The Oklahoma City Bombing? Afterwards there were some residents in Oklahoma City saying the Government and Big Stinking Corporate Media are not telling the citizens of this town the truth. The Las Vegas shooting is the same thing all over again.
When I was much younger,
around the age of eleven, I started reading books on The JFK assassination, and
since then I’ve spent a lot of time looking into what I call The Insufficiently
Investigated Crime. Do you remember Barry Scheck, one of the co-councils
in The O.J. Simpson trial? Scheck co-founded The Innocence Project in
1992, and as Wikipedia says, “it was dedicated to the utilization of DNA evidence as
a means to exculpate individuals of crimes for which they were wrongfully
convicted.” So far, The Innocence Project has had 362 wrongful
convictions overturned. How does that fit into the notion of The Insufficiently Investigated
Crime? Isn’t it obvious? If a person was sent to prison or Death
Row for a crime they didn’t commit, then
the real perpetrator got
away with it, and that happened at least 362 times that I’m
aware of. Insufficiently Investigated
Crimes do happen, probably more often than we think, and if you call me a
Conspiracy Theorist, I’ll turn my back on you.
So, after all these years,
here I was, yet again looking into another mass shooting, this time … Las
Vegas, and little did I know what lay ahead: a mass shooting in my favorite
neighborhood, at The Tree of Life Synagogue in The Squirrel Hill Section of Pittsburgh. If
the noteworthy broadcast journalist Ann Curry asked me, “Alex, how did it make
you feel?” I’d say, “Lady, there aren’t words to describe how I
feel.”
Anyway, I’m getting ahead of
myself. We need to rewind the narrative a bit. As with most Vegas
citizen investigators, it all starts on October 1, 2017. In the days and weeks afterwards, I saw Jason
Goodman at Crowd Source The Truth putting out videos featuring Joe Napoli, who
had been at the concert and was an eyewitness. At that point I started
following Mr. Goodman on YouTube, and
became a fan after watching interviews with
people like Jack Cashill, who wrote the … book Ron Brown’s Body, How One Man’s Death
Saved The Clinton Presidency And Hillary’s Future, which is, among other
things, an excellent book on the sleazy side of Washington K-Street lobbyists
and how that money chase doomed Ron Brown; and another interview with former
CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson, who claimed CBS News had
yielded to pressure from the Obama Administration over her coverage of The
Benghazi Attack and Hillary Clinton, which resulted in Sharyl’s stories getting
shelved more and more often. Sharyl Attkisson is a genuine Investigative
Journalist, unlike some people I could think of.
So, as you can see, I was
already following Mr. Goodman, and by this point was completely hooked on
YouTube generally, and on the kind of content Crowd Source The Truth provides. But
there is a tug of war between being a content creator on YouTube and being a
content absorber, and if you want to get any videos finished and uploaded,
trying to find the right balance between these two activities can be a real
pain in the ass. If there was a position that paid someone to watch
YouTube videos 16 hours a day while scribbling down ideas on Post-It Notes, I’m
the right person for the job.
So, it was late October of
2017, if I remember correctly, maybe later, and Lionel over at Lionel Media
posts a video on his Twitter feed of Jason Goodman and Laura Loomer in Las
Vegas and of their appointment to interview the coroner of Clarke County
Nevada. Laura and Jason were taken inside The Public Safety building
or whatever it’s called, to conduct an interview without cameras. Then
they came back outside and talked about their impressions of how it went.
This was the first time I’d
ever heard Laura Loomer’s name or saw her face. And back then I
though, oh, Laura is interesting. Then I started following her on
Twitter, and it wasn’t long before I found myself absolutely horrified at the
venal things with woman was Tweeting.
I don’t want to spend a lot
of time in this video talking about Laura, but I do want to mention one Tweet
by her in particular. It was about her indifference to the Uygurs, the Chinese Muslim minority being put
into detention camps in China, which was a story in the news last summer. ‘We
shouldn’t be concerned with what’s going on in other countries, and worry more
about what’s happening here,’ Laura said, or words to that effect. Seems
to me, a Jewish woman wouldn't want to see anybody put into a detention camp,
but not our Laura.
I think her
obnoxious behavior and attitude, which gets her kicked out of event after
event, like CPAC, and gets her banned from Twitter and Uber and Lyft and PayPal
is an orchestrated attempt to provoke these types of responses, then run
outside, whip out her smart phone and make a video of herself saying she is
being whatevered because she’s a ‘Jewish Conservative woman.’ I guess
identarian politics isn’t just for left wing jerk-offs anymore.
Normal
people don’t act like this, and I know bat-shit when I see it. I
think Laura is trying to get thrown in jail, so she can do 30 days in The
County Slammer, then steps outside after she’s completed her sentence, greets
her supporters, whips out her smart phone again and makes a video where she
proclaims, “Now they’re jailing Conservatives! Now they’re jailing Conservative
Jewish women! What’s this country coming to?” I’ll tell you what it’s coming to. It’s coming to
grifters running around getting away with their shit, that’s what this country
coming to.
Also, Little Miss Bullhorn has
been trying to muscle her way into the center of the free speech debate, which
in her case I think is mostly a planned-out scheme. Now I know other
conservative activists are getting debanked from Chase Manhattan Bank, which
makes me think you know what they say about one bad apple. But if Chase
Bank suspends Laura’s account and tells her to take her business elsewhere, is
it because Chase discriminates against conservative activists, or is it because
Laura videos herself committing crimes (trespassing),
gets arrested then sends out fund raising emails asking people to contribute to
her legal defense fund. Scam-o, there is no defense to fund if you make
evidence to be used against you public! If I were Chase, I would not
want to be the banker of a grifter, any more than I’d want to launder money for
the Mob. And I’d say to Laura, something I’m sure she’s heard many times
before: “You. Out.”
I mean look at the way this hussy is dressed, displaying
herself to Stormy Daniels’s shyster attorney Michael Avenatti. You call
that investigative journalism? Get outta town.
Thinking
about Laura’s exploitation of The Las Vegas Shooting Truth Community for
purposes of self-aggrandizement really pisses me off, and that’s it in a
nutshell.
Anyway,
enough about her. Still, this was my path to The Las Vegas Shooting
Truth Community, and I found my entrance when Jason Goodman interviewed John
Cullen. I saw the Goodman, Jake Morphonious and John Cullen ‘summit’
on the Las Vegas shooting, which became the most outrageous verbal free-for-all
I’ve ever seen on YouTube, where hyper-vigilant Morphonious goes off on Cullen,
accusing him of being a disinformation agent, and hinting that Goodman may be
connected to The Mossad, an accusation which seems to have permanently
ruptured any working relationship these two had. It’s great YouTube,
though. There’s nothing quite like it out there, and that’s saying
something.
But I also
saw Goodman’s interview with Paladin at Paladin White Hats and I said to myself
… self … you need to start watching Paladin’s videos, and I did. And
next to Paladin’s channel in my que I became aware of other YouTube content
creators covering The Las Vegas Shooting, like Sleep Depp Vegas, 10 ‘o’ Five,
Brian Shields, 5 x 5 News, Sin City Digital Evidence, Mr. Visual, Charlton, and
other channels I haven’t gotten around to yet because Alex The Content Absorber
is only one person.
Anyhow,
like all good essays, whether written or spoken, we now return to where we
began, and that is The YouTube Channel of John Cullen. You’ve got to
understand how I operate. I’m not an investigator in the classic
sense of the word. I’m not flying out to Vegas to look around for
myself, not interviewing witnesses, not going through hotel records. I’m
just somebody who watches YouTube videos, and thinks about them.
For
example, if I’m going through a John Cullen video, looking for stuff that’s
interesting, I might say, I haven’t found anything interesting here yet.
Nothing that nudges me away from the impression I have, from all the Vegas
Shooting videos I’ve seen so far, that there were two fixed shooting
positions. If
John is right about the helicopters, wouldn’t you need at least one stationary
helicopter everybody would be able to see from 1200 feet away, just to make the
facts fit? Now there were helicopters in the air
that night, even as the shooting was going on. I’ve watched videos of
witnesses saying, ‘We heard helicopters.’ So, what is interesting to me
is the fact that helicopters where present. For what purposes?
Observation purposes? For need of an extraction, to get a specialist out?
Bits like that get thrown on to my big imaginary table.
Yes, I have
big imaginary table. I watch Cullen videos, and I see bits that
don’t do a thing for me, and then I see bits that make me say, ‘Hey, wait a
minute. That reminds me of something I’ve seen before,’ and those
bits go on to my table. I do this to everybody. Cullen,
Turber, Paladin, Brian Shields, NINI, everybody. So, I’ve got this
big imaginary table with this big imaginary pile of shit on it, and I stare at
it, waiting for something to jump out at me. And other day something
did: Mumbia. I had a ‘Hmm’ moment as I started to think about …
Mumbia. Hmm for hotels.
Do you
remember the Mumbia India terrorist attack of November 2008? 10 members of
Lashkar-e-Taiba, an Islamic terrorist organization based in Pakistan, carried
out a series of 12 coordinated shootings and bombings that lasted four days. Among
other places, two hotels were targeted, The Taj Mahal Palace Hotel and The
Oberoi Trident. A hostage situation developed at The Taj. And
during the attacks, both hotels were surrounded by Rapid Action Force
personnel, Marine Commandos, and National Security Guard commandos. In
all, the entire attack in Mumbia killed 174 people, 9 attackers, and more than
three hundred were wounded.
So, I
started thinking about Mumbia, which as you can see was a pretty large
terrorist attack. Then I get this idea: what if … The Las Vegas
Route 91 Harvest Festival Massacre was originally designed to be something
bigger, but the attack got scaled back, shrank as it were because conditions
had changed. It’s at that point I started leaning in the direction
that maybe The Vegas shooting was an ISIS operation after all.
What if …
the shooting was still big enough for ISIS to take credit for it, but now small
enough so the FBI could get away with saying ISIS was not involved, thus
depriving ISIS of a propaganda victory? I started revisiting some of
the old questions, like why did Stephen Paddock feel it necessary to take 24
guns up to his rooms? There is one thing we can all agree on … there
was a least one shooter, so Paddock obviously didn’t need all those guns. All he
needed was the .308, the AR-15 with the bump stock, and the .38 with which he
supposedly shot himself, not in the side of the head, not under the chin, not
even eating the gun as is common in suicides, but in his teeth, probably
holding the gun upside down with his non dominant right hand, but I digress.
“So why did
Paddock take all those guns into his rooms?” The standard answer seems to be,
“Well, Stephen Paddock wasn’t right in the head.” Mike Turber on The Hidden
Truth Show got into this. Paddock
was taking Xanax. His psychiatrist wanted to prescribe him something
else but Paddock insisted on Xanax. That story I’ve heard before. Turber
went on to say that maybe Paddock was autistic, somewhere on the spectrum. That
story I hadn’t heard before. Turber then mentions ‘Daddy Issues’. Hmm,
I don’t know, Mike. You can’t quantify that one. That’s
not low hanging fruit. That’s a rotten apple on the ground with a
worm in it.
This one is
for the oldsters. Does anybody remember Charles Whitman, the Texas
Tower sniper who on August 1, 1966, went to The University of Texas in Austin
where he went to The Tower, killed 3 people inside and then went to the
28th-floor observation deck, where he fired randomly at people for some 96
minutes, killing an additional 11.
Whitman
went up into that Tower with multiple firearms. He obviously wasn’t
right in the head, but at least he didn’t drag along a box of target exploding
Tannerite and a vase full of plastic flowers from Walmart. So why
did Stephen Paddock have these things in his room? "Well, he wasn't
right in the head.
Can you see
how this becomes kind of a theory of everything? And the problem
with theories of everything is ultimately they really don’t explain much at
all. I understand the Law of Parsimony, how the simplest explanation
will probably suffice, but the explanation “Well, he wasn’t right in head,”
starts to feel a little too simple.
Let’s look at Paddock’s two rooms with the 24
guns one more time. I say, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck,
and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck. If his two rooms look like they hold
an arsenal ... it’s an arsenal! And what is an arsenal good for?
It’s a place where people can grab guns really fast.
Not only
do we have an arsenal, we have the makings of a car bomb, which thankfully was
never completed, but why did
Paddock have the rudiments of an ammonium nitrate and fuel oil bomb, of the
type used by the likes of the IRA, Jihadi terrorists and The Oklahoma City
bombers? Like a friend of mine suggested, maybe Paddock
was a well-read crazy person. Okay,
but if all Paddock liked to do was gamble, when did he find time to read?
Wearing
their alals that hold down their keffiyeh head scarfs, wearing their brussa
shirts and thobes, Arab gulf state high rollers in Las Vegas are practically a
cliché. Since ISIS did put out propaganda videos before the
shooting, that said Vegas was on their hit list, it might seem like Sin City
would be the perfect confluence for a Jihadist attack. But we are
told it wasn't. However, if keeping a lid on the objective reality
of The Vegas Shooting is ‘In The Interests of National Security’ we’re only going
to get told, “Paddock did it.”
So, this
bring us back to John Cullen and his focus on Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed
bin Salman, and how the turmoil in Saudi Arabia somehow spilled out onto The
Vegas Strip. I would like to propose a scenario. I don’t
know if it’s true, but I’m at my big imaginary table, with its big imaginary
pile of shit, and I’m going put it all through my Human Nature filter, just to
see what comes out the other end. What I’m doing is a synthesis of
everything I’ve seen in the Vegas Shooting videos so far, while looking for the
thread of what humans are capable of doing. Why do you think I call
this, The Human Nature Channel?
Mike Turber has come to the
conclusion that the Las Vegas shooting was a tragedy that sprang from the mind
of one disturbed, evil man, with an axe to grind against the casinos. That
implies that those of us who believe Paddock was part of something bigger, are
chasing shadows, and Mike may be right.
Alex Tamsula, on the other
hand, with his political science background, can’t shake the feeling there’s a
geo-political dimension to all this. And there could be a middle
ground, possibly where baneful human being Stephen Paddock, a big nobody
schlub, with his losing streak and his one-track mind, has money waved under
his nose and is manipulated into something murky and way bigger than anything
he can imagine. Could happen.
So, let’s say it’s early in
2017 and Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman plans a surreptitious,
low-profile trip to The United States, Las Vegas specifically, in order to
travel to Nellis Air Force Base outside of
Vegas and view some Fighter Jets he’s interested in buying for The Saudi
Arabian Air Force. MBS and his entourage would stay at The Four
Seasons Hotel, the separate Hotel on the upper floors of Mandalay Bay. But
somebody leaks this information to ISIS.
“Now’s our
chance,” says Slippery Abdul, rubbing his hands together. The terror
plot is this: a Mumbia style attack on Las Vegas proper, but
specifically focused on The Mandalay Bay, where bin Salman can
watch the nightmare rise beneath his feet. Twenty-three guns will be
there. A straw purchaser has procured them. There will be
a car bomb in the garage. Everything is in place.
Twenty-three
ISIS fighters enter Mandalay Bay, all coming from different directions over
time, making their way up to Paddock’s rooms. (Plural.) When
it’s time to attack, two shooters will fire from the windows at crowd below,
while the other 21 will split into two groups: one group going against MBS and
his personal body guards up in the Four Seasons, the other group to go through
the hotel killing anybody they cross paths with, or maybe even grabbing groups
of hostages, or even taking it into the streets for a running gun battle to divide
our conter-terror units, ala Mumbia.
President
Trump gets a phone call that there is a terrorist attack underway at The
Mandalay Bay hotel in Las Vegas, and that Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, is
trapped on the upper floors. All
manner of counter terrorist units would be called into action, and around the
hotel begin setting up perimeters and staging areas. Word comes down
that MBS is minutes away from being killed.
All the
counter terror units go in, and that’s when the car bomb goes off. Mandalay
Bay gets a big hole in it, or worse. It is the biggest terrorist
attack of all time and a huge propaganda win for ISIS. If it manages
to kill more than 3000 people, it is the new 9/11. And losing a
world leader? US prestige had never been kicked in the teeth so hard
before.
Now let me
show you something. We see the text Route 91. Now here we
see text for October.1. We’ll take the Route away. Then
we’ll take the October away. We’ll put the two together and … (911).
Okay,
before you start accusing me of getting cute with the numbers, let me … remind
you of something. The Madrid Train bombings on March 11, 2004,
happened exactly 911 days after 9/11. Don’t tell me terrorists are
not playing number games with us!
“But Alex,”
you might be saying. “Twenty-three ISIS fighters hiding in Vegas,
cooling their heels before a terrorist attack? That would be a crazy
plan, because the more of them there are, the higher the risk of exposure.” I
agree. Groups of steely-eyed Middle Eastern men wandering around The
MGM Resorts, maybe casing the joint, might trigger a ‘see something, say
something’ response. Yes. The bigger the plan the higher
the likelihood the plot will be uncovered. But here is something you
might not have considered – you're unconsciously picturing this group of
ISIS terrorists as Arabs. Like I said, gulf
state high rollers in Vegas are practically a cliché.
What if
these ISIS fighters were … Caucasians? What if they were Europeans,
or Russians, or Canadians, or Americans, or Australians who converted to Islam
then went to Syria and joined ISIS, where they could rape women and behead men
because theme parks just don’t do it for them anymore.
That’s the
weird thing about ISIS. I’m an old guy who lived through the Al
Qaeda era, and I remember reading stories about how Al Qaeda was a tough
organization to get into. If you wanted to be an Al Qaeda fighter,
they vetted the shit out of you. Saddam Hussein’s Intelligence
Service, The Mukhabarat tried to infiltrate the group a couple of times, and
didn’t have much luck. But ISIS? They seem open to all
comers.
“Those
foolish Hamericans,” says Slippery Abdul rubbing his hands together again. “They
can racial profile till the cows come home. But if it’s a bunch of
white guys, they’ll never see it coming. Bwhahahaha.” Could
Slippery Abdul come up with 23 Caucasoid ISIS fighters? Doesn’t seem
all that hard to me. These could be guys who, after battle field
experience in Syria, were removed to another country for special training. Prior
to sneaking into The United States, they could’ve been staging in … oh I don’t
know … The Philippines? “Hey, did that 100,000 dollar-check clear? Great. We’re
going to Las Vegas!”
Of course,
it didn’t go down this way. Perhaps Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman got tipped off there was an assassination plot in the works. And
when it becomes clear to ISIS that The Prince will be a no-show, what do they
do?
“Shit,” says Slippery Abdul, in Arabic. “We’ve put all
this time and money into this plan. We could just cancel the attack,
but I don’t like that idea. We could go ahead with it anyway in a
truncated form, and risk a lot to gain a little, or … we could contract the
plan to somebody else. An attack still happens, our tracks are
covered like nobody’s business, and we can to take credit for the whole goddamn
thing because it’s our plan. Get on the phone and see if Lash
kar-e-Taiba is busy.”
Now I’m not
claiming any kind of certainty here. I don’t know what really
happened in Las Vegas on Oct. 1, 2017, but what’s funny is, nobody else seems
to know either. It would be ironic, with all the focus on Paddock
Schmaddock and who he was, if … it turned out he was only a small cog in a big
machine. But that’s what’s interesting about the human mind – it has
this real hunger for certainty, which sometimes gets the best of us. This
is another way of saying, like I did in my video No. 7, ‘don’t get fooled by
randomness.’
It could
be, this big mess was, as Mike Turber seems to be saying, just some crazy-man’s
big random mess. The shit all over the place in Room 135, was just shit
all over the place. Maybe there is no rhyme or reason to Stephen
Paddock and he just happens to be the world’s first meticulous,
psycho-accountant, working his way from micro-aggressions to mass death.
But when it
comes to the objective reality of a situation, it is what it is, even if it’s
still too camouflaged for us to see clearly. Personally, I’m not
ready to say ‘Blame The Dead Guy’ just yet. I’ve seen too many other
examples of that.
And no, I’m
not trying to help MGM Resorts or take their side in the lawsuits filed by
victim’s families and survivors. Yes, I know MGM would just love to
have The Route 91 Harvest Festival Massacre officially declared an ISIS attack,
so they can throw up their hands and say, “We couldn’t have for seen this.” I
have an idea for a separate video on this subject. We’ll see.
About three
months ago, before he stopped doing Vegas videos, I was watching one of 10 ‘o’
5’s live streams which he did around noon. “10. 10 ‘o’ 5
here. 10.” He was talking about the fractious
nature of The Las Vegas Shooting Truth Community and how he was getting tired
of the tone. Then he talked about some other things, and eventually
he mentioned something that had been found in Stephen Paddock’s autopsy,
something I had also heard Paladin mention. On the back of Paddock’s
legs where two bruises, one on each calf. I said to myself, ‘Baton.’ 10
said, ‘Night stick.’
In video No. 7 I talked about different ways it would be possible for a second
shooter to escape detection, and in one scenario I described him dressed up as
a Las Vegas Metro Police Department Officer, and how he could slip down stairs,
dressed that way, and blend in with the other responding officers. Who
else is required to qualify at baton?
“Give me
your gun, Steve.” Stephen Paddock is in room 135 with two other men. One
is now holding Stephen’s .38. The other whacks Paddock across the
back of the legs with a nightstick and Paddock goes down on his knees. The
first man puts the business end of the .38 against Paddock’s teeth and says,
“Thanks for everything you’ve done for us Steve, but your services are no
longer needed.”
So, troops,
where do we go from here? Other than all of us banding together and pressuring
our congress people in the US House of Representatives to investigate and hold
hearings on The Las Vegas Route 91 Harvest Festival massacre, I have no idea
other than … race to you to Capitol Hill.
